"At issue in this case is whether the combination of a guilty plea leading to a conviction that was later vacated and some hearsay statements in police reports provides enough reason to believe that Garces trafficked in a controlled substance. Our conclusion is that it does not, at least not in the circumstances of this case." Garces v. Atty. Gen., July 27, 2010.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 28th, 2010 at 12:33 pm and is filed under Deportation & Removal, Immigration Court. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.